i have reverted back to ckr 1.1 on my server as the nade fix as some know actually makes it easier to crash a server.
While still not fully protected it does help because now the nades will drop to the floor when (the crash command) is implemented.
I looked at the code in the fix and as the readme file says it is already supposedly fixed haha fixed my ass.
I presume you guys have already taken this fix off your server??
its off mine... that all i know
SolidScope :
http://www.bashyou.net/pafiledb/pafiledb.php?action=file&id=57
That stop the ability to drop nades.
that's the fix that makes it easier to crash it me ole m8.
No it doesn't... Cause you can't even drop the nades at all. When you hit ur drop button it switches to pistol. And if u don't have any other weapon it floats in the air in front of you. (to you, but to other ppl u're holding it)
yes it does...
we aint gonna tell you how it makes it easyer, but it does...
with the fix i can still crash server
You guys are really pessimistic, ya know that?
pessimistic means negative b4 u ask Elgan!:P
lol i know they are.
i have asked someone who should know about this, am awaiting info will let you know;)
M8, I think pessimistic is the wrong reference for your observation on this topic,
its more like sciolistic!
Elgan b4 u ask sciolistic means superficial.
Elgan b4 u ask superficial means shallow
Elgan u gotta no what shallow means?!
is shallow like when a person jumps in a pool and hits the bottom cos they are teller then the water is high cos it is "shallow?" and not high like in the like deap end?
I KNOW BIG WORDS 2 U KNOW!
like. PNEUMONOULTRAMICROSCOPICSILICOVOLCANOCONIOSIS
a lung disease caused by breathing in certain particles
Yes that is what shallow means
That would be a lung disease caused by inhalation of silica particles
I would sey you are floccinaucinihilipilification Elgan haha 8)
ok.
FLOCCINAUCINIHILIPILIFICATIONIPA pronunciation
The action or habit of judging something to be worthless.
Back in the eighteenth century, Eton College had a grammar book which listed a set of words from Latin which all meant “of little or no valueâ€. In order, those were flocci, nauci, nihili, and pili (which sound like four of the seven dwarves, Roman version, but I digress). As a learned joke, somebody put all four of these together and then stuck â€"fication on the end to make a noun for the act of deciding that something is totally and absolutely valueless (a verb, floccinaucinihilipilificate, to judge a thing to be valueless, could also be constructed, but hardly anybody ever does). The first recorded use is by William Shenstone in a letter in 1741: “I loved him for nothing so much as his flocci-nauci-nihili-pili-fication of moneyâ€.
A quick Latin lesson: flocci is derived from floccus, literally a tuft of wool and the source of English words like flocculate, but figuratively in Latin something trivial; pili is likewise the plural of pilus, a hair, which we have inherited in words like depilatory, but which in Latin could meant a whit, jot, trifle or generally something insignificant; nihili is from nihil, nothing, as in words like nihilism and annihilate; nauci just means worthless.
The word’s main function is to be trotted out as an example of a long word (it was the longest in the first edition of the Oxford English Dictionary but was supplanted by pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis in the second). It had a rare public airing in 1999 when Senator Jesse Helms used it in commenting on the demise of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: “I note your distress at my floccinaucinihilipilification of the CTBTâ€.
Det var en gang en sebra som ikke kunne se bra.
SÃ¥ gikk han til en sebra som kunne se bra.
Så lærte den sebraen som kunne se bra,
den sebraen som ikke kunne se bra å se bra!
Well i think ya got me there, the best i could come up with for that was:
It was a gait a sebra but be able look well. Saw stepped he at a sebra as be able look well. Saw teaching it sebraen as be able look well , it sebraen but be able look well to look well!
A Sciolist isnt just superficial, its when someone gives an opinion with only superficial knowledge of that subject. So you could say that is all of us at one time or another
o and btw, i knew that already, i didnt look it up in a dictionary or do a websearch :p
Neither did I!!

lol
ok ya got me hehe